"Reconstructing ties between archaeological contexts may contribute to explain and describe a variety of past social phenomena. Several models have been formulated to infer the structure of such archaeological networks. The applicability of these models in diverse archaeological contexts is limited by the restricted set of assumptions that fully determine the mathematical formulation of the models and are often articulated on a dyadic basis. Here, we present a general framework in which we combine exponential random graph models with archaeological substantiations of mechanisms that may be responsible for network formation. This framework may be applied to infer the structure of ancient networks in a large variety of archaeological settings. We use data collected over a set of sites in the Caribbean during the period AD 100–400 to illustrate the steps to obtain a network reconstruction."
From https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10816-019-09423-z#Sec13
Construction
"Data set used for the illustrative case study. The data set contains information on 15 sites located between Puerto Rico in the northwestern Greater Antilles and Grenada in the southern Lesser Antilles. The first two columns report information on the geographical area of the sites: the Antilles sub-regions (Subregion) and the islands (Island) on which the sits are located. The next two columns provide the exact location of the sites in terms of latitude (Latitude) and longitude (Longitude). The next five columns contain information on the role played by the sites in the distribution of five lithic materials: Long Island flint (Long Island), serpentinite (Serpentinite), Saint Martin greenstone (St. Martine Greenstone), carnelian (Carnelian), and amethyst (Amethyst). The classification of the sites into supplier (site with lithic workshops), supplier/intermediate, consumer/intermediate, and consumer (site without evidence of stone working) is based on studies of the lithic assemblages of the sites (Knippenberg 2007; Rodríguez Ramos 2007). The last two columns of the data set report information on the quantity of finds (Quantity) and the composition of the ceramic assemblages (Cultural affiliation). Those information comes from excavation (see Hofman et al. (2014) and Hofman et al. (2019)). The data set was created by Corinne Hofman and Angus Mol."
Knippenberg, S. (2007). Stone artefact production and exchange among the Lesser Antilles (Vol. 13). Amsterdam University Press.
Rodríguez Ramos, R. (2007). Puerto Rican precolonial history etched in stone (PhD Thesis). University of Florida.
Hofman, C. L., Mol, A., Ramos, R. R., & Knippenberg, S. (2014). Networks set in stone: Archaic-Ceramic interaction in the early pre-colonial northeastern Caribbean. Archéologie Caraibe, 119.
Hofman, C. L., Borck, L., Slayton, E., & Hoogland, M. L. (2019). Archaic age voyaging, networks, and resource mobility around the Caribbean Sea. In Early Settlers of the Insular Caribbean Dearchaizing the Archaic. Sidestone Press Academics.