Filters
Selected Filters
None
Available Filters
Modern Countries and Continents
File Formats
Network Tags
Network Topics
Node Topics
Edge Topics
Directionality
Weighted
General

Search Fields

The following fields can be used for targeting a specific field as described in the query syntax below.

canonicalCitation
collectionTags
description
fileFormats
id
name
tags.txt
authors.firstName
authors.lastName
authors.orcidId
construction.additionalComments
construction.description
construction.sources.sourceTypes.txt
license.licenseId
relatedPublications.canonicalCitation
structure.directionality
structure.weighted
topic.edgeAttributes.txt
topic.edgeTopics.txt
topic.modernCountriesAndContinents.name
topic.networkTopics.txt
topic.nodeAttributes.txt
topic.nodeTopics.txt

Query Syntax

TitleOperatorExampleDescription
Phrase / Exact match
""
"Roman"
"Roman Road Network"
The term or phrase must be matched exactly (case insensitive) to get a match.
Field Search
FIELD_NAME:()
name:(Roman Road Network)
name:("Roman Road Network")
Field searches makes it possible to narrow the search to a specific field instead of searching all fields. The same operators as used in a normal search can be applied to field searches.
Wildcard
?, *
Roma?
Ro*
Search words including or ending with and an unknown set of characters. The wildcard
?
matces a single character and
*
matches 0-n characters.
Fuzzy
~
Roma~
Squire~
Find words which are similar (spelling wise) to the given word. Good for finding misspelled words. The examples could e.g. result in "Roma, Roman, Rome" or "Squire, Super, Squibb".
Given the length of the word different rules apply *:
[0-2]:
No fuzzyfication is applied - the word must match exactly
[3-5]:
One edit** is allowed
[6-*]:
Two edits** are allowed
* The default rules for edits can be overwritten by applying one of [0, 1, 2] after the "~", where the number specifies the number of edits allowed.
** An edit is an insertion, deletion or substitution of a character.
Must
+
+Roman Road +Network
+name:(Roman Road)
+"Roman Road" Network
Express which terms must be present to get a match:
+Roman Road +Network
Both "Roman" and "Network" must be present, "Road" is not required but would make a better result if present
+name:(Roman Road)
One of the terms must be present in the title field (If all terms must be present prefix each term with a "+")
+"Roman Road"
The exact phrase must be present
Must Not
-
-Roman Road
-name:(Roman Road)
-"Roman Road" Network
Express which terms must not be present to get a match:
-Roman Road
"Roman" must not present
-name:(Roman Road)
One of the terms must not be present in the title field (If all terms must not be present prefix each term with a "-")
-"Roman Road"
The exact phrase must not be present
Grouping
( )
(+Roman +Road) (+Ancient +Network)
Group expressions together to form sub-queries. The Example reads: match ("Roman" and "Road") or ("Ancient" and "Network").
time
1 - 1 / 1
33

"Social, political, and economic institutions covary with one another in heterogenous ways across space and time. Social Network Analysis (SNA) offers a set of analytical tools and conceptual frameworks that have allowed for formal comparisons of interactions, affiliations, and relationships in reconstructing historical trajectories of institutional change. Although archaeologists have made full use of a range of metrics that describe the structural variation of social networks, formal approaches to analyzing the covariance of networks, and the institutions that structured networks in the past, remain undertheorized. In most cases, descriptive metrics are compared between networks built from different datasets or networks separated in time. Using quadratic assignment procedure (QAP) correlations to compare matrices of archaeological data, I draw on a ceramic dataset of approximately 350,000 sherds from the Southern Appalachian region to investigate how decisions related to manufacture choice and to stylistic design covaried with one another between roughly AD 800 and 1650. I explore how material attributes may or may not vary independently of one another and what that means for our analyses of the institutions they reflect. The results contribute to broader comparative analyses of institutional change and perennial discussions of social evolution."

From https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-antiquity/article/heterogeneity-of-social-network-and-institutional-covariance-in-the-american-southeast/DDBE6EB4D61B30CBF6BB6F4F83F2727D

Tags
political-institutions
pottery
Modern Countries and Continents
United States
Collections
Structure
Directionality
undirected
Weighted
yes
Hypergraph
no
Longitudinal
no
Multigraph
no
Multilayer
yes
Multipartile
-
Probabilistic
no
Self Loops
no
Signed
no
Spatial
no
Canonical Citation
Holland-Lulewicz. (2023). Supplemental Material for Manuscript: The Heterogeneity of Social Network and Institutional Covariance in the American Southeast [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7900872
Funding
The research reported here was funded in part by an NSF-DDRI grant (Award #1644359).
Data Publisher
Zenodo
Network Topics
connectivity
social
Node Topics
decoration
pottery
site
Edge Topics
similarity
Node Attributes
surface-decoration
temper
time-period
Edge Attributes
similarity
Uncertainties
Nodes
no
Edges
no
Node Attributes
no
Edge Attributes
no
Statistics
Avg. Clustering Coefficient
-
Avg. Degree
-
Construction

"The files in this folder contain all of the data used to conduct analyses and produce the figures presented in the above manuscript. There are six datasets included. Each dataset is a matrix of Brainerd-Robinson similarity values for ceramic assemblages from archaeological sites across Southern Appalachia. Three of these matrices are for similarities of temper across these ceramic assemblages assigned to the three time periods considered (T1: AD 800-1050, T2: AD 1050-1325, T3: AD 1325-1650). The other three matrices are for similarities of surface decoration across ceramic assemblages from the same sites assigned to the three time periods considered.

The data are included in two forms. Each matrix is included as a .csv file and as a UCINET file. The UCINET files are comprised of two parts, a ##d file and an ##h file. Both are required to open the datasets in UCINET and in NetDraw (UCINET’s visualization component)." "“The Southern Appalachian Social Networks Project was designed and undertaken to explore long-term changes to social and political networks across the Southern Appalachian region of northern Georgia and eastern Tennessee between approximately AD 800 and 1650. Networks were built from ceramic data (described below) from roughly 100 Ancestral Muskogean towns to assess different kinds of social capital that underwrote regional politics. Using a matrix of Brainerd–Robinson values representing similarities between ceramic assemblages at the component level, network graphs were produced. All of the network measures were calculated using weighted data—the actual Brainerd–Robinson values for each matrix. All matrices used to produce the networks, metrics, and figures are provided as both .csv and UCINET files, archived at Zenodo (Holland-Lulewicz 2023). Analyses and visualizations were produced using UCINET (Borgatti et al. 2002).”

Sources

Holland-Lulewicz. (2023). Supplemental Material for Manuscript: The Heterogeneity of Social Network and Institutional Covariance in the American Southeast [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7900872

Source Types
repository

Borgatti, Stephen P., Everett, Martin G., and Freeman, Linton C.. 2002. UCINET for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Analytic Technologies, Harvard, Massachusetts. https://sites.google.com/site/ucinetsoftware/home, accessed August 11, 2023.

Source Types
software
1 - 1 / 1